Sunday, January 31, 2010

Thrillabuster II: Land of the Dead


How do you kill something that is already dead? Our nation's politics have turned into a zombie movie (but not because the GOP lumbers around mumbling the same thing and attacking Dems, while the Dems flee helplessly). Congress is haunted by a superzombie. I tell you, the filibuster is dead, and yet is undead, as in WILL NOT DIE. Observe:

The filibuster was originally created in the nineteenth century to allow a senator to say his peace as long as he wanted (Senators can do basically whatever they want, whereas members of the House have to clean the bathrooms themselves). Over time, they made a rule that 67 Senators could close debate on issue and force a vote (aka CLOTURE), and then 60. But the idea was, it was an emergency barrier to one-in-a-blue-moon, dangerous policy.

This really was a non-issue until the Democrats decided that most of W's judicial nominations were nut-jobs and tried to filibuster them. The GOP reacted strongly saying they were shocked--SHOCKED--to see the Democrats abuse a beloved Senate tradition. When the Dems took back congress and the White House, the GOP, ever the model of consistency, proceeded to vote against cloture on every major issue they voted against.

Example: Health Care
You would expect votes on health care to follow party lines, with moderates feeling torn. You'd assume that some might decide to vote against it without seeing the need to play the filibuster card. And you would be wrong. The Senate Dems got everyone to vote for health care (even the Benator and Joementum, after buying them off). The GOP got everyone, even the Moderate Maine Maidens (who voted for the stimulus) and Chuck Grassley (Max Baucus's bromantic hetero life-mate) to vote for it. Not only did these people vote against it, they all voted against cloture. They went from, "maybe I could vote for this" to "I'm taking desperate measures to stop this."

The GOP has shown it will use emergency measures to block every bill it opposes. So everything the Democrats do is an emergency. But that means emergencies don't really exist anymore (like moderate Senate Republicans). The filibuster, as an emergency brake for legislation, is no more. What's left is an old rule that has strangely mutated into a requirement that only 60 votes can pass a bill (that...or a pair of testicles). The filibuster is dead, and yet must be killed. It is terrorizing the Senate, scaring the hell of out Democrats.

Will Baucus and Grassley’s bromance fall apart? Can the Mormon Mime find the courage to speak out and lead the Senate (or lose reelection in November)? Will Big O finally live up to the hype (or simply end up delivering the greatest concession speech in history)? Tune in next time on WTF is Wrong with our Country?

4 comments:

LeVar Burton said...

Waco, good parallel between the filibuster and a Congressional emergency brake, as it were. We could also call it a Congressional thrusters on full-aft impulse, seeing as that effectively stops any forward movement. Damn you, Type-D reaction control thrusters! After my career on the Enterprise, Starfleet assigned me my own command ... of the Nebula-class USS Sutherland. Seriously, a Cardassian supply ship could outrun the thing. Bastards.

LeVar

The Waco Kid said...

Thank you for commenting, LeVar. You are the best.

LeVar Burton said...

I try. Now, if you could only get Riker back on here...

Wil Wheaton said...

Something tells me that if Pelosi can round up 217, and then makes it well known that she has the votes, suddenly she'll have a landslide of Blue Dogs voting yes. Who wants to be on the wrong side of history in *that* debate, when it's an easy ad for a progressive challenger to primary you with? And the conservatives in your district aren't going to care that you voted no on what they consider horrible legislation. They'll blame you anyway. SO, my prediction: Either Pelosi can't quite get the 217th vote, or she suddenly has 260 or so.